Making a roof insurance claim in Chino

This is a description of how claims generally work, not an opinion on yours. Your policy is the document that decides your claim, and your state insurance department is the authority on what your insurer is obliged to do.

In Chino the failure that leads is the autumn offshore winds, which find anything already loose, and that shapes what a claim here usually looks like. Dry offshore wind lifts material that damp coastal air had been holding down. Most wind losses here happen on a handful of nights a year.

The order things happen in

A roof claim has a fixed shape. Something happens; you document it; you stop it getting worse; you report it; an adjuster inspects and writes a scope and an estimate; the insurer issues a first payment; the work is done; and if the policy pays replacement cost, a second payment follows once you prove the work was completed. Most of the trouble homeowners run into comes from doing those steps out of order — most commonly from letting a contractor start before anything has been documented.

The single most expensive mistake is tidying up before photographing. Once the tarp is on and the debris is cleared, the evidence of what happened is gone, and what is left is your word against an estimate.

Evidence, before anything else

Take four times as many pictures as feel necessary and make sure the dates are intact — most phones record this automatically, and it is worth checking rather than assuming. Include something for scale in the close shots. Photograph the gutters, the vent caps and the downspouts as well as the roof itself, because soft metal records an impact more legibly than a shingle does.

Alongside the photographs, keep a plain written note of what happened and when: the date and rough time of the storm, when you first noticed the damage, who you called and what they said. A dated contemporaneous note is worth a great deal more than a recollection three months later.

The file, in practical terms:

• Interior photographs, including the attic and the underside of the deck
• Any paperwork from when the roof was last replaced or repaired
• Receipts for tarps, emergency call-outs and anything else spent making it safe
• A dated written note of what happened, when, and who you spoke to
• Photographs of undamaged sections of the same roof, for comparison
• Your policy declarations page, showing the deductible and the settlement basis

What the adjuster looks at

An adjuster is not deciding whether your roof is old. They are deciding two things: whether the damage was caused by a peril the policy covers, and whether it happened during the policy period. Everything they do on the roof serves those two questions. They will look for a consistent pattern of damage on the slopes facing the weather, for damage to soft metal that corroborates the story, and for signs that the roof was already failing before the event.

The word that decides most claims is "sudden". Damage that is clearly the result of one event is covered; wear, deterioration, poor maintenance and long-term leaks generally are not, and are usually excluded in so many words.

What your policy actually pays: ACV, RCV and depreciation

There are two ways a policy can pay. Replacement cost value pays what it costs to put the roof back today. Actual cash value pays that same figure minus depreciation for the age and condition of the roof — and on a roof two-thirds of the way through its life, depreciation can be most of the money. Which one you have is written on your declarations page, and it is worth knowing before you file rather than after.

This one line in the policy is usually the difference between a claim that pays for a roof and a claim that pays for part of one. It is not negotiable after the fact; it is what you bought.

Deductibles — including the separate one for wind and hail

The deductible comes off every claim payment, and many policies carry a second, larger one that applies only to wind and hail. That one is often written as a percentage of the insured value of the house rather than as a flat sum, which means it can be several times the size of the ordinary deductible. On a house insured for four hundred thousand dollars, a two per cent wind-and-hail deductible is eight thousand dollars, and a great many homeowners discover this at the worst possible moment.

Check the declarations page for both figures before filing. If the likely damage is smaller than the applicable deductible, filing achieves nothing and still puts a claim on your record.

Why the argument is usually about how much of the roof

Insurers pay to restore what was damaged, not to improve the house. So the fight is rarely about whether there is damage; it is about how much of the roof has to come off to fix it. An insurer may scope one slope. A contractor may say the slope cannot be repaired without the replacement being obvious, or that the material is no longer made in that colour, or that repairing into brittle old shingles will damage more than it fixes.

This is the single most common point of disagreement in roof claims, and it is a technical argument rather than a moral one. It is resolved by a contractor and an adjuster looking at the same roof and talking, which is why having your contractor present is worth arranging.

Storm-chasers, doorstep contracts, and assignment of benefits

Reasonable things to ask, and to have answered in writing: the licence number and the state it is held in, proof of general liability and workers’ compensation cover that you verify with the insurer rather than reading off a certificate, how long the company has traded under this name at this address, who supervises the crew day to day, what the workmanship warranty covers and who honours it, and whether the estimate is itemised against the insurer’s scope.

And one that gets skipped: ask who will actually be on your roof. Plenty of companies subcontract entirely, which is not disqualifying, but you should know it before rather than after.

Signals worth acting on:

• No verifiable local address, or a licence number that does not check out on the state board’s own register
• A contract that binds you regardless of what the insurer approves
• Any offer to describe old damage as part of the new event
• Pressure to sign anything today, or a discount that expires this afternoon
• An offer to waive, absorb, discount or rebate your deductible — this is fraud, and it is the clearest signal there is
• An assignment of benefits presented as routine paperwork rather than as what it is
• A refusal to put the scope in writing, itemised

The line, and which side of it to stay on

The straightforward test: does every document the insurer receives describe what actually happened and what was actually paid? If the answer is yes, everything is fine, including being firm and well-documented about a claim you believe is being underpaid. Pressing hard for a fair settlement is legitimate. Misdescribing the loss is not, and the difference is not a matter of degree.

There is nothing wrong with getting the most your policy actually provides. There is a great deal wrong with getting more than it provides, and the gap between those two is the entire subject.

The clock, in both directions

Report promptly even if you have not decided what to do about the damage, because the reporting deadline runs from the date of the loss and not from the date you noticed it. Reporting is not the same as committing to a claim, and you can withdraw one that turns out to be below your deductible.

There is also a limit on how long you have to sue if it comes to that, which in many states is considerably shorter for a property insurance policy than for an ordinary contract. If a claim is going badly, that limit is a reason to get proper advice early rather than to keep negotiating indefinitely.

A denial is a document, and documents can be answered

A denial has to be in writing and it has to give reasons, usually citing the specific policy provision relied on. That letter is the most useful thing in the file, because it tells you exactly what has to be answered. Read it against your policy and identify which of three things has happened: the insurer does not accept the damage exists, does not accept the cause is covered, or does not accept the amount.

Those are three different problems with three different answers, and treating a denial as one undifferentiated "no" is why so many are never successfully challenged.

In short

The homeowners who do best out of claims are not the ones with the worst damage or the loudest voices. They are the ones with dated photographs, a written scope, and a contractor who turned up to the inspection.